Your message dated Tue, 4 Jan 2005 14:07:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Outstanding ITP - vbtp
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Nov 2003 15:05:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 11 09:05:21 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from relay-3v.club-internet.fr [194.158.96.114] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1AJa53-0005Qh-00; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 09:05:21 -0600
Received: from Galois (f07a-10-169.d1.club-internet.fr [212.194.153.169])
        by relay-3v.club-internet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id 9A3773C3F; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 16:05:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from evariste by Galois with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1AJa3j-0007E2-00; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 16:03:59 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
From: =?iso-8859-15?q?S=E9bastien_Hinderer?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ITP: vbtp -- VisioBraille's Transfer Protocol
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 16:03:59 +0100
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
        tests=HAS_PACKAGE
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : vbtp
  Version         : 1.0
  Upstream Authors : Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  S=E9bastien Hinderer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL             : http://perso.ens-lyon.fr/samuel.thibault/vbtp-1.0.tar=
.gz
* License         : GPL, version 2 or higher
  Description     : VisioBraille's Transfer Protocol

 This program allows you to exchange files with a VisioBraille braille
 terminal.


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 220219-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jan 2005 19:07:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 04 11:07:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.58] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Clu1x-00054n-00; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 11:07:46 -0800
Received: from andromeda (syr-24-59-54-124.twcny.rr.com [24.59.54.124])
        by ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id 
j04J7epl021876;
        Tue, 4 Jan 2005 14:07:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from pryzbyj by andromeda with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1Clu1s-0008Nh-1I; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 14:07:40 -0500
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 14:07:39 -0500
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien?= Hinderer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Outstanding ITP - vbtp
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com 
id j04J7epl021876
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 07:57:04PM +0100, S=E9bastien Hinderer wrote:
> It turned out that packaging this tool wouldn't be a good idea,
> since the resulting package would have been too small to fit with
> Debian's constraints.
How so?  You mean the size?  I'm just curious.

> So the best thing to do is probably to close the bug, but I don't
> know how to do that.
Yes, that makes sense, since nobody else has commented on it.

> Could you please tell me what I should do ?
I'm Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] which will close the bug.

Cheers,
Justin

Reply via email to