Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:17:46 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Aug 2004 17:08:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 02 10:08:34 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BrgIc-0006Gd-00; Mon, 02 Aug 2004 10:08:34 -0700
Received: from ([172.16.63.206]) [217.168.193.69] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BrgIZ-0005zN-00; Mon, 02 Aug 2004 12:08:32 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Rafal Lewczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ITP: openwbem -- An open source implementation of DMTF CIM and WBEM 
system
 management standards.
Bcc: Rafal Lewczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 19:07:58 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
        OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : openwbem
  Version         : 3.0.2
  Upstream Author : Vintela Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and others.
* URL             : http://openwbem.sourceforge.net/
* License         : BSD
  Description     : An open source implementation of DMTF system management 
standards.

(RLE) An excerpt from README:

OpenWBEM is a set of software components that help facilitate the
deployment of the DMTF's (Distributed Management Task Force) CIM/WBEM
technologies. If you are not familiar with the DMTF and it's technologies,
you might want to visit their web site at http://www.dmtf.org.
This software was initially developed by Caldera International and
released to the opensource community under a BSD style license for further
maturation and additional platform support. On initial release, all of the 
software components were written in C++. We expect this to change as the project
evolves and developers add more components to the suite.

(RLE) This is a part of my effort of adding WBEM capabilities to Debian. 
As OpenWBEM implements only a bare framework (say, 'core'), there are
more software packages needed to create a functional WBEM system
management solution, notably sblim* packages and some WBEM clients.
Currently I have a proof-of-concept solution consisting of openwbem
CIMOM server, three sets of management provider plugins and a simple
WBEM client. However, it still lacks many of debian policy requirements:
a Debian-compliant version of all packages will be available soon (I
hope :)


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-ca9100
Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (ignored: LC_ALL set to pl_PL)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 263008-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 23:17:47 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 16:17:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EIaK3-0000z1-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:17:47 -0700
Received: from damog by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EIaK2-0006lI-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:17:46 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: WNPP bug closing
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:17:46 -0600
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Hello,

This is an automatic mail sent to close the ITP you have reported or 
are involved with.

Your ITP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 365 days.
- It hasn't had any activity recently.

As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not 
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the ITP is still of your interest, or there has been 
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).

To re-open it, you simply have to mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a body text like this:

reopen 263008
thanks bts

Further comments on the work done in the bug sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] would be truly welcomed.
Anyway, if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

This is the second massive wnpp closing that is being done. The next close
will be done on inactive ITPs older than 365 days and finally, an automatic
script will close, by default, *inactive* ITPs when they reach one year of
inactivity.

A similar process is being applied to other kind of wnpp bugs.

Thanks for your cooperation,

 -- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:06:42 -0500


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to