On 2005-10-07 17:42:41 -0400 Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 07:28:47PM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
Thanks for your feedback. I've packaged 0.91, and incorporated some
of your suggestions.
Good, I feel it is in quite good shape (and incidently 0.91 catches
more user errors than 0.86). There are still a couple of things to
look at, but that does not look like blockers for an upload. Just
tell me if you'd like to make another pass before an official upload.
Sure, I'll do another pass.
I notice that you repacked the orig tarball. It is not necessary, you
just have to the rename the upstream one, the directory namechange is
not necessary.
Hmm. I didn't purposely repack the orig tarball. It must have gotten
repacked somewhere along the chain.
The doc-base file still refers to the pdf.gz file (heck, lintian
should detect such things, as #196122 says - er, wait, linda does
catch it ;).
heh. didn't think to run lintian/linda after making such minor
changes. ;-)
There is still an install-doc snippet in prerm.
I'll fix that.
I am a bit concerned with the "checking for working fork... no"
message from configure. ...
Didn't notice that. I'll take a look.
There are also a few changes to the documentation that I want to make,
which I discovered after building the package -- it refers to files in
/usr/local/..., which should be changed to /usr/...
--
Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.uhoreg.ca/
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
