On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 07:32:19PM +0200, Krzysztof Krzyzaniak wrote: > Florian Ragwitz wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 04:28:35PM +0200, Krzysztof Krzyzaniak > > (eloy) wrote: > > > > > * Package name : libcatalyst-plugin-static-simple-perl > > Shouldn't this go into libcatalyst-modules-perl? > > Ah, ok. I know what you mean (i've read > .http://pkg-catalyst.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?PkgCatalystPolicy > otherwise). > > Hmm, hard question. Maybe create list of 'core' modules which will go > into libcatalyst-modules-perl (I mean that ones which will be used in > most catalyst application) and rest which extends catalyst but are for > special purposes.
Yes, let's split up libcatalyst-modules-perl. How about libcatalyst-modules-misc-perl? > http://lists.rawmode.org/pipermail/catalyst/2005-October/001880.html > > Soon new release with excluded Catalyst-Engine-Apache. Thanks. Who want's to do the upgrade? I really should subscribe that list. Regards, Flo -- BOFH excuse #371: Incorrectly configured static routes on the corerouters.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature