Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:18:30 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line WNPP bug closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2004 01:04:36 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 17 18:04:36 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from li7-90.members.linode.com (randomnode.info) [64.62.231.90] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C8TeV-0006Ug-00; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 18:04:35 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by randomnode.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4AF4239B; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 21:04:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from randomnode.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (laotzu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 20255-06; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 21:04:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from socrates.dnsalias.org (200-171-244-52.customer.telesp.net.br [200.171.244.52]) by randomnode.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C5242398; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 21:04:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: by socrates.dnsalias.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A730E4AA7; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 22:04:20 -0300 (BRT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jeronimo Pellegrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RFP: latex-sanskrit -- latex support for devanagari and transliterated sanskrit X-Mailer: reportbug 2.99.3 Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 22:04:20 -0300 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at randomnode.info Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name : latex-sanskrit Version : 2.2 Upstream Author : Charles Wikner * URL : http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/language/sanskrit/ * License : LaTeX Project Public License Description : latex support for devanagari and transliterated sanskrit Latex-sanskrit consists of a preprocessor and fonts to display Sanskrit in LaTeX documents. The Sanskrit text can be displayed either transliterated or in devanagari script, including vedic accents. Sanskrit is entered as argument to LaTeX macros, so it is still possible to use the inputenc package to get yet another encoding mixed with the text (for example, ISO-8859-1 with latin accents). The fonts include over a thousand consonant ligatures, and the documentation has a Samyoga table telling from where each ligature was taken (Panini, Coulson, and other fonts). All fonts (devanagari and transliterated) are available in standard, bold and italic faces, and the spacing between devanagari characters may be adjusted. -X-X-X- END of description -X-X-X- NOTE from the package requestor: Upstream author is not working on the project anymore. Quoting readme.txt: -X-X-X- Suggestions and bug reports to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02 January 2002. P.S. I shall be retiring from the world at the end of March 2002, and shall not be available on the Net. -X-X-X- However, his work is excellent, and makes typesetting Sanskrit very easy; the fonts included look very good; the package has excellent documentation. At least for me, makes Unicode irrelevant. There are only a few details in the C program that are rather easy to fix: while(strlen(infilename) == 0) { printf("Input file: "); scanf(infilename); } printf("Output file: "); scanf(outfilename); This may loop forever if compiled with gcc-3.3, and can be fixed by including the format string in scanf (but it would actually be better to check the program and eliminate the possibility for buffer overflows). The other problems are a few unused variables and the declaration of main(). -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (9, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8.1 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=ISO-8859-1 (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US) --------------------------------------- Received: (at 272173-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 23:18:31 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 16:18:31 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIaKl-0001uA-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:18:31 -0700 Received: from damog by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIaKk-000717-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:18:30 -0600 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: WNPP bug closing Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:18:30 -0600 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Hello, This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or are involved with. Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons: - It is, as of today, older than 365 days. - It hasn't had any activity recently. As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen their bugs ;-). To re-open it, you simply have to mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a body text like this: reopen 272173 thanks bts Further comments on the work done in the bug sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] would be truly welcomed. Anyway, if you have any kind of problems when dealing with the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help you on this: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. This is the second massive wnpp closing that is being done. The next close will be done on inactive RFPs older than 365 days and finally, an automatic script will close, by default, *inactive* RFPs when they reach one year of inactivity. A similar process is being applied to other kind of wnpp bugs. Thanks for your cooperation, -- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:06:42 -0500 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]