On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 11:21:43AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
>* Matej Vela ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051111 11:15]:
>>Whoa, I wasn't asking him to upload, I was just pinging ITA bugs.  And
>>after getting no reply, I retitled it to RFA -- request for adoption --
>>not O!

RFA and O have the same goal: to get someone to maintain a package.

>Which is BTW correct behaviour. I cannot see anything really wrong
>(though in cases of ITA-bugs, it might have been a good idea to Cc the
>maintainer on the bug - but that's not really required, and with my
>QA-hat on, I don't mind if you don't :).
>
>(And, BTW, thanks a lot for doing the tedious work :)

I'll leave the package as it is. I don't think you are interested in
my efforts to fix its RC bugs.

formorer, if you are interested, I'll send you the patches I was about
to apply.

>Cheers,
>Andi
>-- 
>  http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/

Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
--
 .''`. Debian GNU/Linux
: :' : Free Operating System
`. `'  http://debian.org/
  `-   http://v7w.com/anibal

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to