Your message dated Thu, 02 Feb 2006 00:01:41 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#350909: ITP: ekiga -- A VoIP softphone
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Feb 2006 15:59:16 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 01 07:59:16 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from [63.245.86.155] (helo=localhost.localdomain)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1F4KO4-0005S1-6L
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 07:59:16 -0800
Received: from santiago by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.60)
        (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
        id 1F4KNw-0001xI-NS; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 10:59:08 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Santiago_Jos=C3=A9_Ruano_Rinc=C3=B3n?=
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ITP: ekiga -- A VoIP softphone
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 10:59:08 -0500
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
        RCVD_IN_DSBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS,RCVD_IN_SORBS_HTTP,RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC,
        X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Santiago José Ruano Rincón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


* Package name    : ekiga
  Version         : 1.99.0
  Upstream Author : Damien Sandras  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL             : http://www.ekiga.org/
* License         : GPL
  Description     : A VoIP softphone

 Ekiga is a softphone with full support for SIP and H.323.
 .
 Among the features, you can find:
 .
 * Call Forwarding on busy, no answer, always 
 * Call Transfer 
 * Call Hold 
 * DTMFs support 
 * Basic Instant Messaging (SIP)
 * Text Chat 
 * Possibility to register to several registrars (SIP) and gatekeepers (H.323)
 * Possibility to use an outbound proxy (SIP) or a gateway (H.323)
 * Message Waiting Indications (SIP)
 * Audio AND Video 
 * STUN support
 * LDAP support

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13
Locale: LANG=es_CO, LC_CTYPE=es_CO (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 350909-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Feb 2006 23:03:33 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 01 15:03:30 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx.verfaction.de ([212.9.177.23] ident=Debian-exim)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1F4R0c-0008IJ-2v
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 15:03:30 -0800
Received: from 246.red-83-42-8.dynamicip.rima-tde.net ([83.42.8.246] 
helo=aragorn.tribulaciones.org)
        by mx.verfaction.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
        (Exim 4.50)
        id 1F4R0V-0003bw-CB; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 00:03:26 +0100
Received: from gimli.tribulaciones.org (unknown [192.168.1.10])
        (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by aragorn.tribulaciones.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB4D56D7B;
        Thu,  2 Feb 2006 00:02:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: by gimli.tribulaciones.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 4398ADF94C; Thu,  2 Feb 2006 00:01:42 +0100 (CET)
From: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Daniel Holbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Santiago =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jos=C3=A9?= Ruano 
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rinc=C3=B3n?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], ML 
Debian-devel <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
         <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 00:01:41 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 83.42.8.246
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#350909: ITP: ekiga -- A VoIP softphone
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:44:12 +0100)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

El mi=C3=A9, 01-02-2006 a las 19:10 +0000, Daniel Holbach escribi=C3=B3:
> Hello everybody,
>=20
> Am Mittwoch, den 01.02.2006, 17:40 +0100 schrieb Luca Capello:
> > 2) will the package be based on the unofficial Debian (but official
> >    Ekiga) snapshot available at [1]?
>=20
> it'd make a lot of sense to do this together with the pkg-voip group.
> They already prepared packages for opal, the newer pwlib and the newer
> openh323 which are required.=20

 As ekiga is not a new piece of software but a Gnomemeeting evolution
(version 2.00),  this ITP has no sense. Ekiga will be package once a
final version is release and new versions of libraries it relies on are
also packagd and in good shape.


--=20
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to