On 10634 March 1977, Manoj Srivastava wrote:

>         I find myself unable to comply with calling the source package
>  Gnus, even though we remove all documentation from the package, and
>  pretending it is just a newer upstream version, since that implies to
>  people looking at the list of sources that this is perhaps unreleased
>  upstream source package -- even though upstream is vehemently opposed
>  to this course of action.

Package gnus, version x.y-z.dfsg.
That way its clearly marked that gnus is modified to be dfsg free, and
you dont change any source/package name. A lot of other packages in Debian
already go this way, I dont see why gnus can't do it.

-- 
bye Joerg
<Zugschlus> Sven Luther hat doch eine schwere Wahrnehmungsstörung, oder?
<Zugschlus> der Mann ist ja schlimmer als ich

Attachment: pgpurqpyVrFh4.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to