On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 19:43:17 +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote: > Current SVN is better. ;-)
I see, I'll try it later. > > * there are some duplicated files in XeTeX and TeXliv/teTeX, > > for example, keyval.sty, xkeyval.sty are such files. > > > > * under the above settings (and the current xetex package) > > xetex/xelatex find keyval.sty of TeXlive (not of XeTeX itself). > > I don't think that these LaTeX packages would cause any problems. I > don't know why they are included in the XeTeX sources, but one could > either omit them, if the versions in teTeX and TeX Live are recent > enough. Or one could install them in /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/... such > that LaTeX formats using other engines can profit from updated versions, > too. > > Actually XeTeX specific stuff (fontspec, xunicode, ...) raise an error > when called with, eg, pdfTeX. > > The more interesting thing are the pattern files for hyphenation. Many > of them should be usable with both XeTeX and other TeX engines. But I > don't know to what extend this has been tested. Others (eg for greek) > are not compatible. Okay, I'll invetigate relation between XeTeX and normal(?) TeX and if I find something important (or what I guess important) I'll report it/them here. > > Is the license problematic? > > I simply wasn't sure. It has been changed recently to something which > looks like an MIT style license though, which should cause no problems. Good to know. Thanks for your kind advice. Regards, 2006-8-9(Wed) -- Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian Atsuhito Kohda <kohda AT debian.org> Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
