Jimmy Tang wrote: > Hi Alastair, > > >> The 2.6.16 code I have works for light use: survives some tests such as >> bonnie, etc. >> but hangs in large workloads: I'm debugging this, but would prefer to >> target 2.6.17 for Etch. >> (even if we don't get in the Etch release, I'd like to support the >> stable kernel.) Some patches >> ported to 2.6.17. >> > > Out of curiousity what sort of heavy workloads are you trying out on the > system? > > None at the moment; we've a small test cluster that had driver issues up to 2.6.17, and so i'm trying out 2.6.17. > I'd be interested in testing the package out on a small test cluster > here as well for users who have heavy IO needs. > > also is there any interest in testing these patches for 2.6.16/17 with > with the openib patches/stacks? > > > give it a bit to sort out some issues with the packaging. The current head-of-tree in the repo is definitely a Work in progress, concentrating on merging current work by Goswin von Brederlow and myself (and others); I plan to get an experimental release worth proper testing, then we can add openib patches. I'll email you as soon as thats ready. Do you have openib patches for 2.6.16/17 ? > Jimmy. > > >
Alastair -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]