On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:00:55 +0100, Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Re: Adam Cécile 2006-11-14 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> * Package name : upstream > > I think that name is too generic, especially given that it is a common > term in Debian language. Imagine a conversation like > > A: There is a bug in upstream. > B: In upstream the package? > A: Yes. > B: In upstream the package or the upstream upstream? > A: ?! > > I don't have a good suggestion, but maybe use "upstreamdev" like the > website. > > Christoph
Hi, I don't think it's a problem because upstream is the cmd-line package. End-users who needs this kind of tools will use kayak or canoe (Qt|Gtk guis). Regards.
