Hey Igor, On Thursday 04 January 2007 06:28, Igor Stroh wrote: > I took over ldap2dns just in order to keep it in Debian. Thanks for doing that.
> I checked the new > upstream version some time ago but haven't had the time to create a new > package for it since iirc it didn't work cleanly with my old LDAP records¹ > and I couldn't figure out what the problem was. > ¹: it wrote the tinydns records just fine, but $? was always 1 I am definitely interested in finding and fixing any backwards-compatibility problems. I took over maintenance of the software since version 0.3.6 and as far as I know no incompatible changes have been made at least since then. Any chance I can get a copy of your LDAP data (or a sample) with which I can test? I'll take a look at the source and find out what is causing the errant return code. By chance have you tried any newer versions than 0.3.6? > I'd say go ahead and take over the package (co-maintainership is fine too), > but keep in mind, that you'd need to provide an upgrade procedure for > older versions (see ¹). Thanks, I'll accept the co-maintainership offer. I'll email you directly in the future, I think the Debian request can be closed. Best regards, /BAK/ -- Ben Klang Alkaloid Networks [EMAIL PROTECTED]