Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > > it was good to meet you in Edinburgh!
Same here. I enjoyed Debconf a lot. Thanks for all the hard work. Enjoyed being able to watch the video recordings too :) > On Saturday 09 June 2007 21:57, you wrote: >>>> The package is now named ttf-sil-andika-desrev to better reflect the >>>> design review status, of course it is still very useful at this stage >>>> but we wanted to make that clearer. (When the more complete Andika is >>>> released when can do a rename). >>> Hmmm. This means, they will need to go through NEW twice :-/ Wouldn't it >>> be better (and have the same effect) to note that in the versionnumber >>> and package description? >> OK, so I took your advice: it's better at this stage to keep the initial >> ITP name. Makes it easier for you and the ftp-master team. > > ok, cool :) > >> The design review status is made clear in the packaging description and >> the changelog. > > Great, was that already in ttf-sil-andika-desrev_0.001-2.dsc ? > >> Will be putting up the new source package shortly. > > :) > > Probably not, as my remarks file is from the 28th of may (arrg! sorry for > taking so long...!) > > Anyway, those were the remarks I had at that time and against 0.001-2: > > - linda+lintian clean, nice > - feedback period is complete (jan 31 2007) but the description or README > mentions it still... (minor, I would still sponsor it like this, but you > should fix it :) Yes, the feedback period is over, but it will still take a while for the final font to be designed and released, so the current design reviews are still very much worth uploading even thought they reflect are WIP. I've added a note about this in the debian/control. No need to change the changelog entries in FONTLOG.txt. > - licence of the packaging? not mentioned in debian/copyright Mmm, seems I've missed that. Fairly new it seems, haven't seen it as such in maint-guide or most other font packages. Will add that. Thanks. > - version: 0.0.desrev-2007.05.08-2 / ttf-sil-andika - you said above this is > resolved/changed 0.001-desrev3 > - control/description mentions authors, debian/copyright doesnt > - AndikaDevRev(A-G).ttf - are those different fonts or different revisions? They have glyph variations. The differences are described on http://scripts.sil.org/Andika_technical > I guess the only issue which really blocks sponsoring is the copyright and > naming stuff, the rest would be nice if you could fix/enhance it. > > Can you point me to a new source package? If the blocking stuff is fixed, > I'll > upload immediatly this time :-) The updated debian/ is committed the Alioth svn and the new source package is on: http://yosch.org/packages/debian > regards, > Holger (still sorry for taking so long to send this short mail...) No problems at all for the delay, and thanks a lot for the sponsoring :) -- Nicolas Spalinger http://scripts.sil.org http://pkg-fonts.alioth.debian.org https://launchpad.net/people/fonts -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]