On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 12:21:25AM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: > > A few things: why is it called "tcpwatch" when it only watches HTTP > > requests? A better name would be "httpwatch". > > it's named that way by upstream. I want to keep confusion to a minimum > and don't see much benefit in renaming it, esp. as it is called that > way in all the literature. No need to make Debian different only > because we can, imho. "Iceweasel" and friends cause sufficient > confusion already (although this is a different case).
Of course, but maybe you can talk to upstream about the name?
--
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
