On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 08:11:29PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote: > "odtwriter" seems a little generic for a package with a specific > purpose. Why isn't the package called "rst2odt"?
The important point is the “Python library” thing. I’ll stick with upstream’s “odtwriter” name for the source package, since there is no need to rename it, and the binary package will be called “python-odtwriter”. rst2odt is just one part of the package, albeit probably the only one most users will come in contact with. The package will be similar to python-docutils (it actually adds a module to its library), which also contains some rst2* scripts. Thanks for your comment, -- Michael Schutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature