Bertrand Marc wrote: > I'm sorry, I knew this link. I was talking about the SVN. There is no > link on the PTS to the SVN. That's not important anyway.
well, it is in the svn. but that version hasn't yet been uploaded as it's waiting for nvidia (or if fglrx is ready earlier, then for that). > So I guess we have to change the name of the module source. I'm waiting > for an answer from the other member of the Fglrx maintainer Team. I > guess you would accept any name like this : *-source. Or maybe you > absolutely want fglrx-source? fglrx-kernel-source? technically, it doesn't matter if it is fglrx-source or fglrx-kernel-source, both are fine. cosmetically, fglrx-source is more beautiful (which results in fglrx-modules-*) rather than fglrx-kernel-source (which results in fglrx-kernel-modules-*), as the latter sounds somehow redundant. > Do not hesitate to contact me if you want any kind of information or > help packaging the module. But remember that I don't understand python... the lmn is not the problem, but the fglrx-source (or fglrx-kernel-source) must be made compliant to it. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
