Hi Miles ! Le Sunday 03 August 2008 11:41:50 Miles Bader, vous avez écrit : > Shouldn't the package name include "ocaml" somewhere? Doesn't ocaml > have some sort of standard package/library package-naming convention? > > Something like this is pretty clearly language specific (many languages > have json i/o libraries). Including "ocaml" in the package name would > both be much more convenient for the user (when searching for something > like a json support library, often one must wade through a lot of > inapplicable packages), and safer against future name collision to > include ocaml.
There is a difference between the source package name and the binary package name. The source package name is usually not seen by the end user, and I believe it's good when it is closed to the original project's name. But the binary package, the one that will be installed by the user will be called "libjson-static-camlp4-dev", so I think it answers your question. Romain -- while ( love & passion ) { for( fight = 0 ; rights < freedom ; rights++ ) fight = standup( rights ); free( babylon ); } -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]