Hi Ding, Sorry for the late reply.
On Tuesday 05 August 2008 09:32, Ding Honghui wrote: > I has update the fields and reupload the package to mentors.debian.org. > And I will commit in the codes to svn when I'm approved to. Ok, good. I've uploaded your package. For further uploads of curlftpfs, please contact me directly. I still have some comments on the current package which you should keep in mind for the future and/or fix in the next revision: From your .diff.gz: > +curlftpfs (0.9.2-1) unstable; urgency=low > + > + * New upstream release. (closes: #480320,#449207,#461455) Unless all three bugs are about packaging the new upstream release, this is a bad habit of writing a changelog entry. Better would be something like this: * New upstream release. (closes: #999111) - Fixes bug A. (closes: #123456) - Fixes problem when doing this and that. (closes: #123457) Bug #999111 is then the report which is about packaging the new upstream release. Second, the build-dependency on libcurl4-gnutls-dev should be versioned, it should be "libcurl4-gnutls-dev (>= 7.17.0)" because libcurl4-gnutls-dev packages existed which does not fullfill the above requirement. See Debian Policy for reference: > 4.2 Package relationships > [...] > If build-time dependencies are specified, it must be possible to build the > package and produce working binaries on a system with only essential and > build-essential packages installed and also those required to satisfy the > build-time relationships (including any implied relationships). In > particular, this means that version clauses should be used rigorously in > build-time relationships so that one cannot produce bad or inconsistently > configured packages when the relationships are properly satisfied. Cheers, -- Frank S. Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP public key ID: 0xDC426429 Debian Developer finger fst/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.