Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 08:17:38PM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote: >> * Package name : lxtask > > You know that lxtask is just a rip of xfce4-taskmanager? Is it really > useful to have both in the archive? Why not have upstreams merge the > stuff, instead of duplicating?
Yes, I know, so I didn't package it in the beginning. The reason to package it because lxtask can independent runs with other DE without any additional dependence, but xfce4-taskmanager needs xfce4 related dependence. Cheers, -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
