>> > Hence the question goes as: considering that the next release of >> > Debian is most likely going to be released with Emacs (>= 23.1), which >> > is integrated properly with EasyPG, do we need alpaca in Debian? I >> > believe the answer is «no». >> I think that the alpaca package isn't meaningless even if less >> people use alpaca than EasyPG. >> `alpaca' uses symmetric encryption with "--cipher-algo AES" for a >> new *.gpg file by default, while I haven't found an easy way to >> customizet EasyPG. >> To avoid the complexity of handling *.gpg files, I won't enable the >> alpaca feature if EasyPG is installed, and I'll suggest EasyPG and >> add more information in the alpaca package document. > I don't intend to push alpaca into the Emacs main tree. Please > allow making just an optional Debian package.
> Does anyone still strongly have objection to this ITP? If so, > please tell me against the above comments. Yes I have, this package for *one single file* won't make it into Debian, sorry. Please have it included in emacs-goodies-el, it seems to fit very well there. -- bye, Joerg [Talking about Social Contract]: We will not discriminate noone[...] [So we discriminate anyone?] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]