On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 09:41:16AM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 07:35:53AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 02:17:31AM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote: > > > > > > retitle 520661 ITA: xulrunner -- XUL + XPCOM application runner > > > owner 520661 a...@debian.org > > > thanks > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 06:43:41PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > Package: wnpp > > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > > > See the great thread about "Sponsorship requirements and copyright > > > > files" on > > > > debian-devel to understand why. > > > > > > > > > > I have not read through mail archive to understand why this triggered > > > your move, but for now I take the ITA for this package ... could be > > > that i jump off after reading that thread for sure :).
I have read the thread now a bit and I agree that listing all copyright holders in debian/copyright is really a stupid; debian is not maintaining and distributing a perfect list of IP owners for source code; we distribute software. Period. - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org