Hello Sandro, thanks for your answer. You are of course right with regard to the easily fixable things.
On 2009-09-21 23:31 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 23:02, Sven Joachim <svenj...@gmx.de> wrote: >> On 2009-09-21 22:31 +0200, Ryan Niebur wrote: >> >>> >>> why not just upload it as a QA upload? >> >> Because it's not really suited as such -- new upstream release with lots >> of changes, lots of changes in the Debian packaging as well; that's a >> bit invasive for a QA upload. > > ?? QA uploads are just like any other uploads, but they are done in > the name of the QA team. that's all. So please go ahead. I suppose I should subscribe to the PTS then and deal with any breakage the upload may introduce, right? >> | I: ne: arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share 2424kB 89% > > could not be an issue. If I'll ask for an RFS, I want to fix this first. Should not be too difficult and would give me some packaging training. > Please consider to fix those simple lintian warnings and then submit a > RFS on debian-ment...@l.d.o: this way, your help would be much more > effective. Regardless of whether I do that or not, I have just asked to be added to the collab-maint group so that I can put my Git repository there (don't want to use my home directory on Alioth for that package). Regards, Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org