Hi, >>"Martin" == Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> If the NPL is DFSG complient, which I think it is according Martin> to my memories, it should be listed in the DFSG/SC. Why? We certainly do not want to list every licence which is DFSG free as examples in the DFSG. I object to having to change the DFSG every time a new license appears on the scene. Martin> If the NPL is not DFSG complient, I believe, we should state why we Martin> don't consider it as DFSG complient. It is DFSG compliant. It just is not one of the examples. The examples are by no means considered to be an exhaustive and complete list (It oes nt say: these are the only licenses we feel are compliant, it just says here are some we feel are free). We should not change the DFSG for something this trivial. Martin> In either case, could the web-master team put this on their todo list Martin> please? I think there is no need for this. manoj -- "Even if you're on the right track, you'll get run over if you just sit there." Will Rogers Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/> Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E