On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 12:51:52PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
> > It would be polite to note that it is not our intention to get people
> > spammed by keeping archives, or that we do it because we're bastards who
> > don't give a ...., because we aren't, we feel your pain :)
>
> Whatever happened to the plans to obscure the mail addresses in the
> archives? A simple fix is just to substitute a different character for
> the @, or (to confuse 90% of spambots) to encode @ as @ in HTML.
Arguably, 90% doesn't quite cut it, does it?
Every time a bunch of people request obfuscation, an equivalent amount of
people oppose it.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
