Your message dated Tue, 31 Dec 2002 01:06:54 -0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line New Year                                                       
 
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Oct 1999 21:50:18 +0000
Received: (qmail 29753 invoked from network); 28 Oct 1999 21:50:17 -0000
Received: from tele-post-20.mail.demon.net (194.217.242.20)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 28 Oct 1999 21:50:17 -0000
Received: from wetware.demon.co.uk ([194.222.114.136])
        by tele-post-20.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2)
        id 11gxP7-000Knz-0K
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 21:48:17 +0000
Received: from lee by wetware.demon.co.uk with local (Exim 3.03)
        id 11gxP5-0002o1-00; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 22:48:15 +0100
From: Lee Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: Signed messages not displayed in list archive
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.6
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 22:48:15 +0100

Package: www.debian.org
Version: 19991028

I was browsing through the list archives and I came across 
http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/debian-security-announce-99/msg00030.html

which shows a link to "PGP message" rather than the message itself.
Downloading the message gives me the ascii-armoured message.
Useful perhaps for checking the signature - but it would be more
useful for the text to also be displayed in the page.

(This bug/wishlist should possibly be re-assigned to mhonarc 2.3.3 but I'm
 personally not using that software.)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 48601-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Dec 2002 00:29:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 30 18:29:39 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (hotmail.com) [200.52.208.41] 
        by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 18TAAR-0003V0-00; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 18:22:01 -0600
Received: from [145.141.18.109] by smtp-server1.cfdenselr.com with SMTP; Mon, 
30 Dec 2002 15:24:52 +0200
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp4.cyberemailings.com) (208.244.199.32)
        by public.micromail.com.au with smtp; 30 Dec 2002 17:21:04 -0300
Received: from unknown (81.208.159.226)
        by mts.locks.grgtween.net with asmtp; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 14:17:16 +1000
Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Orto
Subject: New Year                                                        
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 01:06:54 -0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Importance: Normal
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=5.0
        tests=FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,INVALID_MSGID,
              MISSING_MIMEOLE,NO_REAL_NAME,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
              SUBJ_ENDS_IN_SPACE,TO_MALFORMED,USER_AGENT_OE
        version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: ***

: )))..


Please, please write again, hope you still have my email, to make things worse 
I am not
sure about yours either, anyway you can always catch me on 
http://www.singlers.com/index_vip.html

Hope to see you very, very soon.

Kisses and more :)

Dealy





Reply via email to