Your message dated Tue, 8 Apr 2003 16:46:43 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line done has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Apr 2003 05:19:33 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 05 23:19:32 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from adsl-64-161-114-2.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (lobus.fungible.com) [64.161.114.2] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 1922Z1-0006F2-00; Sat, 05 Apr 2003 23:19:32 -0600 Received: by lobus.fungible.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9FB197F4D; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 21:19:29 -0800 (PST) From: Tim Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: packages.debian.org: wrong reported version for testing libc6 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 21:19:28 -0800 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: Package: www.debian.org Version: N/A; reported 2003-04-05 Severity: important Visit http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages. Scroll to "Search package directories". Enter "libc6" after "Keywords:", uncheck "Allow searching on subwords", set "Distribution" to "any", and click "search". The resulting page includes the line testing libc6 2.2.5-9.woody.3 I think the reported version number is wrong. According to my /var/lib/apt/lists/lobus:9999_main_dists_testing_main_binary-i386_Packages file (I use apt-cache), the libc6 in testing is 2.3.1-16, not 2.2.5-9.woody.3. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux lobus.fungible.com 2.4.17 #14 Mon Jan 27 20:30:29 PST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C --------------------------------------- Received: (at 187670-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Apr 2003 23:44:25 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 08 18:44:24 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from svfulraptor1.beckman.com (catalunya) [134.217.237.30] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 1932lL-0000hg-00; Tue, 08 Apr 2003 18:44:23 -0500 Received: from kraai by catalunya with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1932nb-0004eG-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 08 Apr 2003 16:46:43 -0700 Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 16:46:43 -0700 From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: done Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=4.0 tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: Howdy, Joy has applied and improved my patch. The version of libc6 in testing is now shown to be 2.3.1-16. I also checked that the security updates for stable are still shown. Matt -- It's most certainly GNU/Linux, not Linux. Read more at http://www.gnu.org/gnu/why-gnu-linux.html.