On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 10:20:48AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 01:50:26AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > It's disk space against cpu usage. Clearly the first is much > > cheaper. > > Perhaps I should also mention the exact cause of those 500 errors that > was briefly mentioned on -www recently -- the MaxClients 300 setting > on gluck exceeds the maxproc 256 setting. Of course, this is a bug, > and it will be fixed, but this still means that apache on the machine > often runs two hundred processes as it is, so adding more CGIs/PHPs > wouldn't exactly be the happiest solution.
Sane performance tuning strategies dictate that more stuff should be in-process, then. Is mod_perl feasible? -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]