Your message dated Tue, 16 Sep 2003 05:23:41 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#202158: Revised patch
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jul 2003 10:02:41 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 20 05:01:26 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19eB0Q-0006Qa-00; Sun, 20 Jul 2003 05:01:26 -0500
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 668E626B2E; Sun, 20 Jul 2003 12:01:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 2177722988; Sun, 20 Jul 2003 12:01:24 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 12:01:24 +0200
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: devel/people should list co-maintained packages as well
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
At the moment, http://www.debian.org/devel/people does not take the
Uploaders: field into account at all. It would be great if the page
could indicate that you are the uploader (i.e. co-maintainer) of a
package.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 202158-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Sep 2003 12:17:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 16 07:17:26 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from host-66-81-26-239.rev.o1.com (ftbfs.org) [66.81.26.239]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19zElp-0000vq-00; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 07:17:25 -0500
Received: from kraai by catalunya with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19zErt-0000KD-00; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 05:23:41 -0700
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 05:23:41 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#202158: Revised patch
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,QUOTE_TWICE_1,
RCVD_IN_ORBS
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_16
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_16
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 01:39:37PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 11:07:04PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > When I run it, it produces the following output:
> >
> > re-creating people.names file...
> > Unknown maintainer format:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Unknown maintainer format:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Unknown maintainer format:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Unknown maintainer format:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Unknown maintainer format:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > installing the updated people.names file into webwml...
> >
> > Could it be made to handle these?
>
> Hmm, in the original script this is not a warning but a fatal error (it
> dies). How should I handle it? Just don't output the warning? Otherwise
> it will probably require changes at different places all over the
> script.
I don't know. It would be nice to merge it with the existing
entry for Matthew Vernon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, but I guess this
shouldn't hold it up.
> > It lists packages twice if someone is both a maintainer and an
> > uploader. See Andreas Barth, for instance.
>
> Fixed.
>
> > It mangles the e-mail address of Ben Bell, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Fixed.
I've applied it. Thanks for the patch and patience.
--
Matt
