* Debian WWW CVS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-08 13:08]: > Modified files: > english/News/weekly/2004/01: index.wml > > Log message: > Rephrased paragraph about meta-gnome2, keeping it out hinders proper > GNOME, > not the other way around.
Uhm, I am not sure if I understand your correction correctly: Can someone please proofread if the correction is in fact correct? #v+ <code>meta-gnome2</code> packages. He listed 13 packages that bear one or more problems. Each of them is a reason to keep <code>meta-gnome2</code> out -of the testing distribution, which is required for proper GNOME in sarge. +of the testing distribution, which stops proper GNOME in sarge. #v- From my understanding the old version was more clear. meta-gnome2 is required for proper GNOME in sarge. Oh, I see your misunderstanding: You think the "which" corresponds to the keeping out of meta-gnome2, not meta-gnome2 itself. But your change doesn't really clear what the which corresponds to. Can someone please suggest a rephrase to make it clear? Alfie -- mknod /dev/aha c sky earth -- me, 08/2000
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature