Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2003 05:40:50 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 20 23:40:50 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from tx.symonds.net [64.246.28.87] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18ar9W-00071m-00; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 23:40:50 -0600 Received: from tc210-203-44-151.3-16.pl.ebtnet.net ([210.203.44.151] helo=jidanni.org) by tx.symonds.net with asmtp (Exim 4.04) id 18ar9S-0008V0-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 00:40:49 -0500 Received: from jidanni by jidanni.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18anKk-00025s-00; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 09:36:10 +0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="BIG5" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Dan Jacobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: www.debian.org: http://packages.debian.org/unstable/allpackages.html too big X-Mailer: reportbug 2.2 Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 09:36:10 +0800 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.1 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: ** Package: www.debian.org Version: unavailable; reported 2003-01-21 Severity: wishlist http://packages.debian.org/*/allpackages.html is over 1 meg. please put warnings on their parent pages. BTW, tidy(1) shows tons of: Warning: <font> attribute "color" has invalid value "FF0000" also there, please make a link: list of packages added, updated within the last week, month. BTW, what is <BODY> doing deep in http://packages.debian.org/unstable/allpackages.html <dt><a href="web/libroxen-sexybody.html">libroxen-sexybody</a> 0.2-7 <dd><BODY> tag replacement module for the Roxen Challenger web server <dt><a href="web/libroxen-simplenews.html">libroxen-simplenews</a> 2.7-7 some mostly offline folks might just want a quick diet checklist of current package numbers, 3dwm-clock 0.3.1-11 3dwm-csgclient 0.3.1-11 3dwm-geoclient 0.3.1-11 3dwm-pickclient 0.3.1-11 3dwm-server 0.3.1-11 3dwm-texclient 0.3.1-11 one could use this makefile B=http://packages.debian.org/unstable/allpackages.html t=/tmp/f $t: lynx -dump -nolist $B|sed -n '/^ [^ ]/s/...//p'|sed '1{/About/d;};/^$$/,$$d' > $@ asv: $t #see what is newer than last time I got Packages.gz apt-show-versions -u |sed 's#/.* # #'|sort|join - $t|awk '$$2!=$$3' or better yet, you could put a $t.gz on the site... less than 100K instead of the 1000 K download... may be better ways. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux debian 2.4.19-k7 #1 Sun Oct 6 20:29:56 EST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=zh_TW.Big5, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.Big5 --------------------------------------- Received: (at 177669-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2004 19:05:26 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 12 13:04:53 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AfKXZ-000319-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:56:41 -0600 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=webmail.sorgfalt.net) by mail.sorgfalt.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt)) id 1AfKXY-0007UF-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 Received: from 217.234.62.246 (SquirrelMail authenticated user djpig.frank) by webmail.sorgfalt.net with HTTP; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET) Subject: Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed From: "Frank Lichtenheld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: debian-www@lists.debian.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal References: In-Reply-To: Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=4.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 X-Spam-Level: Yesterday the new packages.d.o scripts were installed. They include many improvements and fix a few bugs (BCCed XXX-done@ with this mail): * Contain information about non-i386 packages Closes: #21620: packages.debian.org: download.pl: package download pages should support multiple architectures Closes: #23350 merged bug Closes: #83701: packages.debian.org: pages should say on what platforms has a package been compiled Closes: #131631: packages.debian.org: pages for non-i386 packages are missing Closes: #141618, #146675, #220218 merged bugs Closes: #215999: packages.debian.org: source not found if i386 is outdated * Include DDTP translations * Better parsing/using of input data Closes: #109338: packages.debian.org: display the installed size, too Closes: #135220: packages.debian.org: non-US, non-US/contrib and non-US/non-free mixed together Closes: #202157: packages.debian.org: pages should list uploaders Closes: #208513: gcc 2.95.4 source has disappeared * Handle virtual packages Closes: #155346: packages.debian.org: Please include virtual package names when listing dependencies. Closes: #204099: packages.debian.org: expanding virtual packages can lead to doubled dependencies * Create an alternative compressed text list of all packages Closes: #177669: packages.debian.org: allpackages.html lists are too big * Minor fixes: Closes: #125976: packages.debian.org: it shouldn't print header for related packages when none of them exist Closes: #162588: packages.debian.org: please add a last-modified timezone Closes: #219653: packages.d.o/experimental/ table formatting bug Closes: #221114: packages.debian.org: Spelling error in packages overview I will leave "#224143: www.debian.org: Packages.debian.org still not restored" open until search_packages is back, too. Special thanks to Joey for his work to get this done and to Joy for his feedback while writing the scripts. Gruesse, Frank Lichtenheld