On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 03:20:14PM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote: > Index: News/weekly/2001/6/index.wml > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/News/weekly/2001/6/index.wml,v > retrieving revision 1.3 > diff -u -u -r1.3 index.wml > --- News/weekly/2001/6/index.wml 29 Apr 2002 07:02:00 -0000 1.3 > +++ News/weekly/2001/6/index.wml 9 Mar 2004 14:13:07 -0000 > @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ > Collins</a> and > <a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote-0102/msg00018.html">Branden > Robinson</a> have posted platforms so far. Ben listed some specific issues > -he wants to deal with if if elected, including "<i>allowing new maintainers > +he wants to deal with if elected, including "<i>allowing new maintainers > with less privileges</i>", QA, and a more pro-active stance on security. > Branden, in turn, listed some issues including a more formalized delegation > process, keeping track of unmaintained packages and MIA developers, and
Already fixed. > Index: ports/alpha/sys_types.wml > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/ports/alpha/sys_types.wml,v > retrieving revision 1.10 > diff -u -u -r1.10 sys_types.wml > --- ports/alpha/sys_types.wml 6 Mar 2004 01:25:08 -0000 1.10 > +++ ports/alpha/sys_types.wml 9 Mar 2004 14:13:08 -0000 > @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ > </tr> > > <tr> > -<td>AlphaSever 800 5/333...500</td> > +<td>AlphaServer 800 5/333...500</td> > > <td>Corelle <i>(Noritake family)</i></td> > <td>Yes</td> Fixed. > Index: security/faq.wml > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/security/faq.wml,v > retrieving revision 1.36 > diff -u -u -r1.36 faq.wml > --- security/faq.wml 27 Feb 2004 23:56:19 -0000 1.36 > +++ security/faq.wml 9 Mar 2004 14:13:08 -0000 > @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ > > <toc-add-entry name=missing>I've seen DSA 100 and DSA 102, now where is DSA > 101?</toc-add-entry> > <p>A: Several vendors (mostly of GNU/Linux, but also of BSD > - deriviates) coordinate security advisories for some incidents and > + derivates) coordinate security advisories for some incidents and > agree to a particular timeline so that all vendors are able to > release an advisory at the same time. This was decided in order to > not discriminate some vendors that need more time (e.g. when the I changed it to "derivatives", since neither of the others is in the dictionary. > Index: security/index.wml > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/security/index.wml,v > retrieving revision 1.69 > diff -u -u -r1.69 index.wml > --- security/index.wml 3 Mar 2004 19:16:32 -0000 1.69 > +++ security/index.wml 9 Mar 2004 14:13:08 -0000 > @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ > the <a href="#DSAS">Debian Security Advisories</a> are > <a href="cve-compatibility">CVE-Compatible</a> and Debian is represented > in the Board of the > -<a href="http://oval.mitre.org/">Open Vulnerability Assesment Language</a> > project. > +<a href="http://oval.mitre.org/">Open Vulnerability Assessment Language</a> > project. > </P> > > <H2>Keeping your Debian system secure</H2> Already fixed. > Index: security/2003/dsa-324.wml > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/security/2003/dsa-324.wml,v > retrieving revision 1.5 > diff -u -u -r1.5 dsa-324.wml > --- security/2003/dsa-324.wml 21 Jul 2003 15:48:18 -0000 1.5 > +++ security/2003/dsa-324.wml 9 Mar 2004 14:13:09 -0000 > @@ -30,9 +30,9 @@ > <li> The SPNEGO dissector could segfault while parsing an invalid > ASN.1 value. > <li> The RMI dissector handled strings improperly > + as these modules are not present.</p> > </ul> > > -<p>as these modules are not present.</p> > > <p>For the stable distribution (woody) these problems have been fixed in > version 0.9.4-1woody5.</p> Fixed. > Index: vote/2000/leadership_debate/transcript.wml > =================================================================== > RCS file: > /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/vote/2000/leadership_debate/transcript.wml,v > retrieving revision 1.5 > diff -u -u -r1.5 transcript.wml > --- vote/2000/leadership_debate/transcript.wml 18 Jan 2003 13:21:53 > -0000 1.5 > +++ vote/2000/leadership_debate/transcript.wml 9 Mar 2004 14:13:09 > -0000 > @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ > Generally, better communication should prevent this sort of thing though - > and I think that's very important. > > <p><b>Ben:</b> > - I think I differ in my assesment of the "new maintainer fallout" in > that I think it deals more generally with some core issues in our structure... > + I think I differ in my assessment of the "new maintainer fallout" in > that I think it deals more generally with some core issues in our structure... > <br><b>Ben:</b> > after talking to a couple of people involved with new maintainer I was > shown that they were basically asking for help quite a while before they > decided to close > asking for help indirectly, but still, they asked I don't want to change quotes, so I didn't fix this. -- Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ftbfs.org/