On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 15:17 +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > On 2004-04-16 15:09:07 +0100 Alexander Winston > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I thought that I should add that a new date format has now appeared > > A patch would probably be better.
I was under the impression that one would be unwelcome. Would it not be?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part