On Sun, Sep 05, 2004 at 11:13:31PM +0200, Florian Ernst wrote: > True, there were some issues I didn't dare to touch thus effectively > leaving this to more proficient readers of the English language. Some > parts of your patch are included in what I mentioned in > <http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2004/09/msg00028.html>[0], some > more proposals are included as well. > Please check all this when you have the time, and I promise it's the > last time I bring this up. :)
OK, I checked your patch but I'm not sure about: Index: devel/testing.wml =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/devel/testing.wml,v retrieving revision 1.19 diff -u -r1.19 testing.wml --- devel/testing.wml 29 Feb 2004 22:24:28 -0000 1.19 +++ devel/testing.wml 2 Sep 2004 08:55:57 -0000 @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ consequently won't be released in "stable".</p> <p>The "testing" bug count for a package is considered to be roughly the bug -count at the last point when the "testing" version equalled the "unstable" +count at the last point when the "testing" version equaled the "unstable" version. The bugs tagged <strong><current_release_name></strong> or <strong><current_testing_name></strong> will not be counted. Bugs with the <strong>sid</strong> tag will be counted, though.</p> I know that unequalled is Brit. and unequaled Amer. style but equalled isn't contained in http://dict.leo.org or the ding package (and I'm sure you use the same dictionaries as I). Also s/inofficial/unofficial/ is not wrong but also not absolutly necessary. Since nobody complained yet and most parts of your patch are OK I suggest that you apply it. It's always possible to revert small parts ... Jens
