On 2005-08-12T16:03:20+0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Tommi Vainikainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's not worth relicensing from one set of non-free terms to > another, unless you think the current licence is harder to > understand than the longer CC licences, or something. With any > luck, there'll be a free-software-ready CC soon.
Hmm, maybe I should read CC licenses sometime. :-/ Also noticed that my report was rather technical (broken link), but there has been for a long time other report #238245. Maybe this should be discussed with -legal and have some kind of recommendation of good license? GNU GPL? >> Is this how hard to change? Now it says that SPI has all copyright. > > If that is true, I think it just needs DPL to ask SPI relicense. Well, I know as a translators that I've never assigned (in any formal way) copyrights to SPI, but the web pages now clearly say that SPI has copyright... -- Tommi Vainikainen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
