Hi Florian, On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 02:45:06PM +0200, Florian Ludwig wrote: > Florian Ludwig wrote: > > though the report is old the author is right. There is a easy and nice > > tool called 'optipng' in sid and testing that should do the job. (I'm > > not sure if the attached pics are up to date) > > > > I hope someone will at least replace the images that are already png's > > and close the bug. > > > > see: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=315371
PNG images in the navigation bar were recently removed in favour of CSS. But now I see that you refer to other images in Pics and lossless size reduction. > I hoped someone would do this but it seems nobody is interested in it. I am. It looks interesting, I was just not aware of this bug report. (I did a similar task for another project recently, but it was necessary to first write a patch against ImageMagick so that it accepts my large pixmaps and it is able to reduce these :-) > I think there are some more bugs that should be closed but i have no Most likely. It would be nice if you could check for such bugs and maybe also provide patches when necessary. > access [i'm not a DD] so i hope someone with access will have a look at you don't need to be a developer, have you found this information somewhere? I remember I thought in the past the same but you can close all bugs you want as described in http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing > the following list where i began to collect some informations about bugs > that should be easy to close... Please try to close these yourself if you are *really* sure it's save. > #324142 > www.debian.org: Out of date translation not mentioned > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=324142 > > Seems to be corrected but not closed. No! The report is about a missing indication that the page is not up-to-date, not about the translations itself! > #263553 > experimental not described on the release page > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=263553 > > experimental is not a hole distribution so there are no releases and so > it shouldn't be one the release page > So, move to 'Will Not Fix' ? Maybe, but since the bug is from our webmaster I suggest not to touch it. > #302287 > www.debian.org: Link of dev-ref is broken in japanese html > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=302287 > > It seems so that there is just no Japanese version, so could someone > please remove the link [0]. He, this patch affects me :-) Forgot about it but it should be reassigned to the proper package. If I remember correctly my patch was silently ignored ... Currently PS and PDF files for developers-reference are disabled, don't know why. > #298759 > www.debian.org: "Why Debian" page contains paragraph that seems dated > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=298759 > > the second sentence of this paragraph at the why debian page [1]: > "NT and XP have shown themselves to be very bad also." > So also new and "up-to-date" systems are mentioned and so the bug can be > closed. I'm really not the right person to analyse M$ security. But the old Windows 95 reference should really be removed. "Windows 95 has essentially no security. NT and XP have shown themselves to be very bad also." Please propose a fix but do not close it. > [0] http://www.nl.debian.org/doc/devel-manuals#devref > [1] http://www.debian.org/intro/why_debian Jens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
