Your message dated Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:10:31 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#136998: www.debian.org: Website pages should indicate
what ``package'' bugs should be filed against
has caused the Debian Bug report #136998,
regarding www.debian.org: Website pages should indicate what ``package'' bugs
should be filed against
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
136998: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=136998
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Version: 20020305
Severity: normal
At the moment, there's no way of knowing for sure what
psuedopackage a bug should be filed against if you find a problem
with the website. Some pages are maintained by the webmaster,
others by ftp-master, others by the new maintainer team, and so
forth.
It would be very useful if some indication of who the responsible
maintainers are were available. That indication could take the
form of a mailto anchor link to send mail to the appropriate
package, but I would be happy with just a note about which
psuedopackage was the relevant one, even if it appeared in an HTML
comment.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux diziet 2.2.19-fal #2 Mon Apr 30 18:15:17 PDT 2001 ppc
unknown
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi!
* C.M. Connelly <[email protected]> [2002-03-05 23:17:51 CET]:
> At the moment, there's no way of knowing for sure what
> psuedopackage a bug should be filed against if you find a problem
> with the website. Some pages are maintained by the webmaster,
> others by ftp-master, others by the new maintainer team, and so
> forth.
>
> It would be very useful if some indication of who the responsible
> maintainers are were available. That indication could take the
> form of a mailto anchor link to send mail to the appropriate
> package, but I would be happy with just a note about which
> psuedopackage was the relevant one, even if it appeared in an HTML
> comment.
Actually I am currently not aware of any service we have up that
doesn't contain contact information in the footers (since already a few
years - sorry for catching up late). If you still find such a page
please mention it explicitly.
Thanks!
Rhonda
--- End Message ---
