Le Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 03:55:31PM -0400, David Prévot a écrit : > > If git-cvs is useful for some of us, and if it may be useful for new > contributors, let's just document it so it will give users a choice, but > since the website relies on some CVS specific features (translation > check for example)
I actually asked what the blockers are, because the translation checks is the example that always comes, and I have not seen many others. If there is no way that the website will migrate away from CVS, it would be pointless to try to solve the problem of tranlation checks. But if there is a chance that the work is not wasted, I would be willing to have a look on how to determine how many times a page has been modified compared to its translation, using Subversion revision numbers or git commit references instead of CVS version numbers. This is why I am asking the outcome of the disucssion at the WWW sprint. Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
