Hi Paul. Thank you for your input. [email protected] wrote on 01/05/2015 03:17:49:
> For most other ports, the port names for a "family" of ports all > redirect to a single page, for example amrhf/arm64/armel all redirect > to the arm page. I wonder if that would be appropriate for > powerpc/ppc64el/powerpcspe? I can try and integrate what I have sent with powerpc page. I am not sure about powerpcspe though, because it already has a whole page of its own. Also it is an unofficial port (not that this really matters here). > I would recommend not hard-coding the list of porterbox names, that > sort of information is liable to get out of date. Indeed, there is > also plummer.d.o now in addition to pastel.d.n. How would you suggest it to be done? A contact point maybe? Thanks and regards. -- Fernando Seiti Furusato Software Engineer IBM Brazil - Linux Technology Center -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
