Hello
El 20/11/23 a las 10:43, Thomas Lange escribió:
Hi
I'm still not sure which of the languages we need or which are just
bugs in packages. Or do we have bug in the scripts, that generat this
language list?
What about the AA_BB and AA@somestring languages?
For e.g. I wonder why we have international/l10n/po/man_DE
which links only to this po file:
https://i18n.debian.org/material/po/unstable/main/i/i2p/installer/resources/locale-man/i2p_0.9.48-1.1_man_de.po.gz
This po file cleary says
"Language: de\n"
Why is the language then called man_DE and not just "de"? Is this a
bug in our scripts?
I think this is a bug, because those po files are named man_ because
they are translations of the manual pages, not because of the Mandingo
language.
"Similar" thing happens with
https://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po/bos_DE (and all other
bos_XX links in https://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po/): they are
translations files of the boswars package, having two translations
templates, one named boswars_version_xx.po.gz and another one named
boswars_version_bos_xx.po.gz, so that "bos" is misdetected as Bosnian
language.
I don't know *where* is the bug, though: it can be in the i2p package
because of wrong structure or naming o files (sorry, I don't know the
related policy), in the l10n scripts* that gather the material
(https://salsa.debian.org/l10n-team/dl10n/) or in our code that process
that data in webwml repo. Hence I'm CC'ing debian-i18n and
debian-l10n-devel for the case anybody knows and it's easy to fix. If
not, a quick workaround could be to exclude the problematic packages
from our stats (exclude them from the dl10n scripts so no material is
generated).
Kind regards,
--
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona