Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> Indeed, I believe this is an Xrm issue, not necessarily a Xt one.

Well the file I referenced is the only .c or .h file in all of X that
contains the string '"app-defaults"'.

> Hacking X to do this seems bad.  Why did upstream not have a similar redundant
> search path?

Remember, upstream almost never thinks about backwards compatability and
incremental upgrades the way we do.

-- 
see shy jo


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to