Seth Arnold wrote:
> Perhaps it is cutting out users who join the project with woody's
> original release. You don't fall into this category. You *can* install
> 3.3.6-11potato18 though, which is probably pretty damn close to the
> 3.3.6-18 you miss so much.
I feel like after giving a 'head's up' on my concern over utah and the X
roadmap, that I shouldn't have to worry about deps going so far as to
choose my X version.
Some of this relates to some of the main things I have critized debian
for since I started using it a few years back. When I brought up
concerns, I was dismissed. When I asked why I was dissmissed, I was
told the old stand by "it's not supposed to work". Also the mentality
that I *should have to repair the packages and shouldn't trust the
packagers judgement. It is very infuriating over time... I can't
believe that I should put all these packages I'm assumed to have on hold
so often either.
> Eh? Hmm. Maybe you forgot a 'not' somewhere in this sentence. Could you
> please rephrase that, and more directly apply it to your case of not
> putting the 3.3.6 packages on hold?
What I was saying is that some commerial applications in linux require utah.
cheers,
Terry
--
---------------------------------------------------
| GooseEgg http://gooseegg.sourceforge.net |
| QuakeForge http://www.quakeforge.net |
| Personal http://www.westga.edu/~stu7440 |
| |
| Death is running Debian GNU/Linux |
---------------------------------------------------
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
