* Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001214 03:23]: > We don't _need_ to compile it on m68k, since it does not even work yet. But > I still have some hope that one or more of the zillions of m68k users step > forward to pick up the pieces and make X work (btw no reply yet from the X > guy, Michael). Hmm. That just reminded me. One of my calculators has an m68k chip. I want it to run X. :) Heheh. -- ``Oh Lord; Ooh you are so big; So absolutely huge; Gosh we're all really impressed down here, I can tell you.'' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- m68k MANIFEST for xfree86_4.0.1-11 Christian T. Steigies
- Re: m68k MANIFEST for xfree86_4.0.1-11 Branden Robinson
- Re: m68k MANIFEST for xfree86_4.0.1-11 Seth Arnold
- Re: m68k MANIFEST for xfree86_4.0.1-11 Ben Collins
- Re: m68k MANIFEST for xfree86_4.0.1-11 Michel Dänzer
- Re: m68k MANIFEST for xfree86_4.0.1-11 Branden Robinson
- Re: m68k MANIFEST for xfree86_4.0.1-11 Seth Arnold
- Re: m68k MANIFEST for xfree86_4.0.1-11 Aaron Lehmann
- Re: m68k MANIFEST for xfree86_4.0.1-11 Christian T. Steigies
- Re: m68k MANIFEST for xfree86_4.0.1-11 Seth Arnold
- Re: m68k MANIFEST for xfree86_4.0.1-11 Michel Dänzer
- Re: m68k MANIFEST for xfree86_4.0.1-11 Christian T. Steigies