Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 12:18:46PM -0500, David Starner wrote: > > While the issues on unmodifiable non-software stuff in Debian are > > not as clear-cut as Branden has made them out to be (I know of at > > least a half dozen packages in main that are unmodifiable, that were > > put there knowing that) > > What are they? They need serious bugs filed against them. e.g. doc-rfc ? -- James -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] David Starner
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] Branden Robinson
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] Branden Robinson
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] James Troup
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] Taketoshi Sano
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] Branden Robinson
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] Joseph Carter
- Re: DFSG and fonts [was: Bug#91856: Hello] Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS