Your message dated Tue, 11 Jan 2005 04:49:18 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#263877: Various display artifacts in uxterm
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Aug 2004 03:58:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 05 20:58:19 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mta13.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Bsvs3-0008Gz-00; Thu, 05 Aug 2004 20:58:19 -0700
Received: from mizar.alcor.net ([69.167.148.207]) by mta13.adelphia.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP
          id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
          for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 23:57:48 -0400
Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1BsvrX-0005fo-Ew
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 05 Aug 2004 20:57:47 -0700
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 20:57:47 -0700
From: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Various display artifacts in uxterm
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.64
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Sender: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: xterm
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6
Severity: normal

This would have been Severity: minor, except that today I ran into a case
where it actually lost information (for all practical purposes) which should
have been displayed.  I originally noticed that threaded mode in mutt was
not handled correctly:

1. Open an mbox in mutt with some threads in it: mutt -f <mbox file>

2. Set threaded mode: 'o', 't' (drawn correctly)

3. Cause uxterm to redraw, e.g. by switching desktops, iconifying/restoring
uxterm, etc. (drawn incorrectly, some parts of the screen revert to the
uxterm background colour where they had previously been set to a different
colour)

Today, I noticed a somewhat different situation with hdparm:

1. man hdparm (I happen to have hdparm 5.5-4, and use less(1) as a pager)

2. Scroll to line 44 (in the paragraph describing the '-c' option)

3. Note that part of the sentence "A numeric paramter[sic] can be used..."
is omitted (this is clear from reading the text).  It reads:

"A numeric parameter can be  used  to  enable/disable  32‐bit I/O support:
Currently sup‐ ported values include 0 to disable  32‐bit  I/O  support,
[whitespace] enable 32-bit data transfers"

while the text should read:

"A numeric parameter can be  used  to  enable/disable  32‐bit I/O support:
Currently sup‐ ported values include 0 to disable  32‐bit  I/O  support,
_1_ to enable 32-bit data transfers" ("_1_ to in place of [whitespace])

Setting LC_ALL=C prevents both these effects (I typically use en_US.UTF-8).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8

Versions of packages xterm depends on:
ii  libc6                     2.3.2.ds1-15   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libexpat1                 1.95.6-8       XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii  libfontconfig1            2.2.3-1        generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6              2.1.7-2.1      FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libice6                   4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libncurses5               5.4-4          Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libsm6                    4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System Session Management
ii  libxaw7                   4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Athena widget set library
ii  libxext6                  4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxft2                   2.1.2-6        FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxmu6                   4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System miscellaneous util
ii  libxpm4                   4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X pixmap library
ii  libxrender1               0.8.3-7        X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  libxt6                    4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Toolkit Intrinsics
hi  xlibs                     4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System client libraries m
ii  xlibs-data                4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System client data

-- debconf information excluded

-- 
 - mdz

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 263877-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jan 2005 09:49:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 11 01:49:21 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (sisyphus.deadbeast.net) 
[65.26.182.85] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CoIeO-0007Gn-00; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 01:49:21 -0800
Received: by sisyphus.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 4ACE568C019; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 04:49:19 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 04:49:18 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#263877: Various display artifacts in uxterm
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 06:00:23PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 12:53:23AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > XTerm #197, which was released on Monday, 30 November, will be in xterm
> > 4.3.0.dfsg.1-9, which Fabio and I expect to release very soon (there ar=
e no
> > more changes pending).
> >=20
> > Matt, if you could try to reproduce your problems with that package
> > version, I'd appreciate it.
>=20
> I am unable to reproduce the bug with that version (nor with xterm from x=
org
> 6.8.1).

Thanks for following up, Matt!

Closing this report as presumably resolved by upstream changes.

--=20
G. Branden Robinson                |     Don't use nuclear weapons to
Debian GNU/Linux                   |     troubleshoot faults.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                 |     -- US Air Force Instruction 91-111
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |

--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkHjoR4ACgkQ6kxmHytGonyNjACfc78NDOnlJ7bIO5GVP3gMy6Kd
KcMAniiGY18K9YuT8RaapO8ke5N4zQM/
=Asoi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to