On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 11:54 +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 09:51:08AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:27:56 +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > > Any updates here? As a udev reverse dependency this is quite important
> > > for earlt multi-arch conversion.
> 
> > It'll probably happen on the next upload, but I'm not going to rush
> > that.  (What does this have to do with udev?)
> 
> Looks like an ubuntuisim. needed inderectly for animated startup graphics,
> sigh. No hurry on debian side then it seems.

libdrm-intel now depends on libpciaccess, plymouth depends on
libdrm-intel, and so on.

The -dev package shouldn't be marked as multiarch; the i386 package is
not parallel installable with the amd64 package as they both
ship /usr/include.  In general, my understanding is that -dev packages
should not be multiarched (yet).

I should apparently also read Debian bug reports more often.  I'd just
pushed a dh7 cleanup branch which also adds multiarch to the
debian-experimental git branch before reading this mail.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to