Your message dated Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:42:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing unfixable bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Mar 2004 22:26:49 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 11 14:26:49 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from lns-vlq-1-82-65-166-150.adsl.proxad.net (localhost) [82.65.166.150] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B1Ydc-00078a-00; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:26:49 -0800 Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5A263C491; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 23:26:41 +0100 (CET) To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libxft-dev: Upgrade to 2.1.2-6 from 2.1.2-5 fails X-Debbugs-CC: Yannick Roehlly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 23:26:41 +0100 (CET) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yannick) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08 X-Spam-Level: Package: libxft-dev Version: 2.1.2-5 Severity: normal Hi! When upgrading from 2.1.2-5 to 2.1.2-6, the process fails for some diversion problems: Pr=E9paration du remplacement de libxft-dev 2.1.2-5 (en utilisant .../libxft-dev_2.1.2-6_i386.deb) ... diversion of /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft.h to /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft1.h by libxft-dev Removing `diversion of /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft.h to /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft1.h by libxft-dev' dpkg-divert: rename involves overwriting `/usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft.h' with different file `/usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft1.h', not allowed dpkg : erreur de traitement de /var/cache/apt/archives/libxft-dev_2.1.2-6_i386.deb (--unpack) : le sous-processus pre-installation script a retourn=E9 une erreur de sortie d'=E9tat 2 Sorry for the French ;-) but I think the essential words are in English. Yannick -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.3 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages libxft-dev depends on: ii libc6-dev [libc-dev] 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Development L= ibrari ii libfontconfig1-dev 2.2.2-1 generic font configuration l= ibrary ii libfreetype6-dev 2.1.7-2 FreeType 2 font engine, deve= lopmen ii libxft2 2.1.2-6 FreeType-based font drawing = librar ii libxrender-dev 0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client= libra ii xlibs-dev 4.3.0-5 X Window System client libra= ry dev ii zlib1g-dev [libz-dev] 1:1.2.1-4 compression library - develo= pment -- no debconf information --------------------------------------- Received: (at 237509-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2005 15:42:40 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 02 07:42:40 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHklk-0002N4-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 07:42:40 -0800 Received: from cpe-65-26-182-85.indy.res.rr.com (sisyphus.deadbeast.net) [65.26.182.85] by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHklj-0007N6-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 08:42:39 -0700 Received: by sisyphus.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1D8FE68C019; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:42:08 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:42:08 -0500 From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: closing unfixable bug Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="eLe8FOcWSbbyMVJD" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --eLe8FOcWSbbyMVJD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This bug is unfixable without an addition to dpkg's feature set, which wouldn't do any good for xft versions 2.1.2-[12345] anyway, all of which have long since expired from Debian testing and unstable. For details on why I can't fix this bug, please see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D237509&msg=3D44 Closing this bug (and the many duplicate reports merged with it). --=20 G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux | Yeah, that's what Jesus would do. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Jesus would bomb Afghanistan. Yeah. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | --eLe8FOcWSbbyMVJD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkJOvU8ACgkQ6kxmHytGonwVIwCfcFJksR6P9msKp+aYu4l4D+he BkYAoJR304l4frBxieSHqNRruobX1ycw =IkK1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --eLe8FOcWSbbyMVJD-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]