Your message dated Sun, 16 Jun 2013 21:42:09 +0200 with message-id <20130616194209.gu6...@betterave.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#673839: Building an udeb binary has caused the Debian Bug report #673839, regarding Building an udeb binary to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 673839: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673839 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: libxdamage Version: 1:1.1.3-2Currently gtk is doing a second build pass with different configure option for its udeb flavor because libxrandr, libxcomposite and libxdamage don't have udebs. It would be nice if you could add an udeb to libxrandr so we could bring gtk into a single pass buildThanks,
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 19:29:27 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Package: libxdamage > Version: 1:1.1.3-2 > > Currently gtk is doing a second build pass with different configure > option for its udeb flavor because libxrandr, libxcomposite and > libxdamage don't have udebs. It would be nice if you could add an > udeb to libxrandr so we could bring gtk into a single pass build > Closing as wontfix. Cheers, Juliensignature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---