Le 24/09/2013 18:07, Julien Cristau a écrit : > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 17:36:37 +0200, Vincent Blut wrote: > >> Le 24/09/2013 17:20, Julien Cristau a écrit : >>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 17:07:41 +0200, Vincent Blut wrote: >>> >>>> Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel Version: 2:2.21.15-1+b1 >>>> Severity: wishlist >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I'm testing the SNA acceleration method since ≈ 1 month >>>> without any apparent regressions. I think it could be >>>> interesting to enable it early in the Jessie development in >>>> order to catch regressions on the potentially large range of >>>> Intel hardware that Debian users are using. >>>> >>>> Opinion? >>>> >>> I don't personally think it's a terribly good idea. >> >> Any specific reasons Julien? >> > Previous experience switching acceleration infrastructure is poor.
Ok, makes a lot of sense, I wasn't aware of this previous experience. > UXA mostly works. UXA has 4 or 5 times less code than SNA. I'm > not aware of any compelling reasons to switch. Upstream has recently switched to SNA (in 2.21.14 I think), so let's wait what positive/negative things does that bring! > > Cheers, Julien > Sunnily, Vincent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5241bd30.1080...@free.fr