2015-05-06 15:22 GMT+03:00 Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org>: > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:40:51 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: >> Btw, I notice that XSF is still using Debhelper compatibility 8. Is >> there any particular reason for foregoing compatibility 9? >> > Depends on the package. I've been updating a few to debhelper compat 9 > recently. For drivers however, at least when using dh_auto_configure, > that requires overriding its multiarch libdir setting to keep things > under /usr/lib/xorg/modules. But there's no specific reason to avoid > bumping to 9 AFAIK.
The consequences of compatibility level 9 (automatically enforced multiarch libdir) on drivers is precisely what I'm worried about. If there is a standardized debian/rules stanza for overriding this for X drivers, I would love to hear about it. Cheers! Martin-Éric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/capzxpqdgthjyyc6mmezuxdc8qmxj5je8wwem3hkurr6lh_o...@mail.gmail.com
