Hi,
Your upload of venus-protocol 1.1.3-1 to the NEW queue has had an automated
review: an LLM-based check of its licensing and packaging, run by the DFSG team
using the Debian Inference service. It is not a decision on the package, and -
like other LLM-based work - it can be wrong.
It found 0 blocker, 1 important, 1 minor issues:
- [important] [packaging] venus-protocol-dev does not depend on libvulkan-dev
although its headers include <vulkan/vulkan.h>
- [minor] [licensing] debian/copyright records include/* and xmls/* as
Apache-2.0 only, while those files are Apache-2.0 OR MIT
You can read the full review here:
https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org/reviews/venus-protocol#assistant-report
Please look at it, and respond by visiting the link below (you'll be asked to
authenticate with Salsa first):
https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org/llm-review/xQdmrlylYqlz1YISZcTkXliEJqB9G-Nw
There you may choose to reject the upload yourself, while you fix issues and
re-upload, or add comments to clarify or dispute the review.
Your comments are for the DFSG team member who reviews the package, not for the
LLM: it will not read them or reply. Tell the reviewer where you think the
automated review is right or wrong, and why. Comments are public and shown with
the review; you may use markdown, e.g. to link to clarifying information.
If you have any questions, please reply to this e-mail and someone from the
team will respond.
If you would rather not be e-mailed about these reviews, log in at
https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org
and say so on your profile page.
Thanks!
